• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G49877
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/10/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
E1: phone number (b)(6), postal code (b)(6).H3 - device has been returned and preliminary evaluation has been performed, however, our investigation is ongoing and device evaluation summary will be included in our follow up report once our investigation has been completed.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported, while preparing the stent from a universa firm ureteral stent set for insertion, the stent separated.Another stent was used to complete the unspecified procedure.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation ¿ evaluation.It was reported, while preparing the stent from a universa firm ureteral stent set for insertion, the stent separated.Another stent was used to complete the unspecified procedure.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.A visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), the instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures.One universa firm ureteral stent was returned for evaluation in opened package with label.A visual exam notes that the proximal coil was separated 2.0 cm from the last ink mark.There was also a tear in the separated coil that starts at the last side port and continues through the tip.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record showed no discrepancies related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records showed no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu packaged with the device contains the following in relation to the reported failure mode: ¿precautions: do not force components during removal or replacement.Individual variations of interaction between stents and the urinary system are unpredictable.¿ ¿how supplied: upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the information provided, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation, the cause of the separation based on the appearance of the returned device seems to be due to improper tether removal.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET
Common Device Name
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key23717738
Report Number1820334-2025-01502
Device Sequence Number15681102
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002498778
UDI-Public(01)00827002498778(17)280825(10)16756653
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAU
PMA/510(K) Number
K161236
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/31/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG49877
Device Catalogue NumberUFH-600
Device Lot Number16756653
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/21/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/10/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/03/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/04/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/31/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/25/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-