| Model Number |
305C227 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Cardiomyopathy (1764); Heart Block (4444)
|
| Date of Event |
07/14/2012
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that 4 days post implant of this 27mm aortic bioprosthetic valve, a permanent pacemaker was implanted.The reason for the permanent pacemaker was reported as cardiomyopathy and complete heart block (chb).No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Updated data: a.4: weight in lbs: b.5: event description medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received that reported the patient did not have any pre-existing arrhythmias prior to heart valve implant.It was further noted that the physician believes the implant procedure caused or contributed to the conduction disturbance.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|