|
The device was not returned for analysis.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.Based on the information received, the investigation determined that the reported material separation, device damaged by another device, foreign body in patient, delay to treatment, and serious injury appears to be related to user error.In this case, it is possible that the material separation, device damaged by another device, foreign body in patient, delay to treatment, and serious injury are the result of use of device placement and not maintaining adequate space between the oad and spring tip.It was reported that the physician was aware they were too close to the tip of the viperwire guidewire but continued advancing as close as they can as this was a last effort to prevent surgery.This resulted in the oad crown coming in contact with the viperwire tip causing guidewire fracture.The dback periph exch 1.25mm sl 145cm oad us instruction for use (ifu), warns: ¿never advance the orbiting crown to the point of contact with the guide wire spring tip or other distal device.The maximum travel of the crown advancer knob¿and therefore the shaft tip¿is 15 cm.Moving the crown advancer knob forward moves the shaft tip an equal distance toward the guide wire spring tip.When moving the crown advancer knob, make sure there is sufficient distance between the guide wire spring tip (or other distal device) and the distal end of the shaft (10 cm minimum).If the distance between the shaft tip and the guide wire spring tip (or other distal device) is insufficient, the shaft tip may damage the guide wire spring tip (or other distal device) and result in device or component dislodgement.Distal detachment and embolization may result.¿ based on the results of the complaint investigation, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
It was reported that a 1.25 solid diamondback 360 peripheral exchangeable orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used for treatment of heavily calcified, non-tortuous, chronic total occlusion (cto) lesion in right superficial femoral artery (sfa) through left femoral artery up-and-over approach.A 7fr sheath was in use.An abbott command guide wire was initially advanced to the lesion as far as it can go and exchanged for a viperwire advance peripheral guide wire with flex tip.The viperwire guidewire was then advanced halfway through the sfa.There was no wire bias.Initial treatment was started.The physician was aware they were too close to the tip of the viperwire guidewire but continued advancing as close as they could as this was a last effort to prevent surgery.This resulted in the oad crown coming in contact with the viperwire tip causing guidewire fracture.The viperwire radiopaque tip remained in the right sfa without further medical intervention since the physician believed no device could get through the occlusion.The oad and the viperwire were removed.The procedure was aborted.The patient was scheduled for surgical femoral bypass.The date of the procedure was unknown.It was noted that atherectomy was performed as a last attempt intervention before bypass surgery as per request of the patient.The physician does not have any concerns about the fractured component and does not intend to remove the component.The patient was stable and discharged the same day as planned.
|