• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL AORTIC BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL AORTIC BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3300TFX
Medical Device Problem Code Calcified (1077)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Dyspnea (1816); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 09/09/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 21mm 3300tfx aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of 9 years, 2 months due to calcification.The explanted valve was replaced with a 25mm 11060a valved conduit.The patient discharged on pod#7.Per pathology, explanted aortic valve consisted of severe calcification with mild pannus.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional 'customer complaint'.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections : b7, g3, g6, h2,h6 ( type of investigation) corrected sections : b5, h6 ( component code , clinical code, investigation findings and investigation conclusions) svd is a logical and expected consequence of the chemical, mechanical, and immunological processes associated with bhv implantation.The common endpoint of all these factors is calcification and degradation.Svd is an acquired condition, intrinsic to bioprosthetic valves, characterized by deterioration of the leaflets or supporting structures, leading to thickening, calcification, tearing, or disruption of the prosthetic valve materials.These changes result in valvular dysfunction manifesting as stenosis and/or regurgitation with a consequent drop in hemodynamic efficacy of the valve.Despite the advancements in the heart valve industry, svd commonly begins 7- 8 years after implantation, with a considerably increased rate in patients with pertinent comorbidities and/or an implant duration of greater than 10 years.Prior investigations and extensive literature review have shown that svd is predominantly related to patient factors and implant duration rather than to manufacturing issues.Events related to device design, manufacturing, or use error tend to manifest at an earlier implant duration.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.Based on the information available, the most likely root cause is patient factors, including an implant duration of 7 or more years and hyperlipidemia.A device history record (dhr) review is not performed because there is no allegation of a malfunction which could be related to a manufacturing non-conformance and/or one was not suspected or confirmed through investigation; no labeling non-conformance/deficiency; no device-related infection; and no evidence of a product failure with regard to design, reliability, or use error.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 21mm 3300tfx aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of 9 years, 2 months due to calcification with stenosis.Patient presented with dyspnea, chest pain, and fatigue.The explanted valve was replaced with a 25mm 11060a valved conduit.The patient discharged on pod#7.Per medical records, patient presented with aortic root dilation.Cardiology states that patient current aortic valve is undersized and has failed, resulting in symptomatic aortic stenosis with dyspnea, fatigue, and chest pain.Patient underwent ascending aorta + root replacement, avr, laa, and tvr.Intraoperatively, aortic valve was noted to be severely deteriorated with significant pannus.A 25mm 11060a aortic valved conduit was implanted in replacement.Patient tolerated the procedure well with no immediate complications and discharged on pod#7.Per pathology, explanted aortic valve consisted of severe calcification with mild pannus.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional 'customer complaint'.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL AORTIC BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2 - office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key23739255
Report Number2015691-2025-09815
Device Sequence Number10162791
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103176131
UDI-Public(01)00690103176131(17)200201
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/27/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/01/2020
Device Model Number3300TFX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/10/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/23/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/08/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/27/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/02/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization; Life Threatening;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-