• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMBU A/S ASCOPE 5 BRONCHO 2.7/1.2

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMBU A/S ASCOPE 5 BRONCHO 2.7/1.2 Back to Search Results
Model Number 624001000US
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/10/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
During investigation it was possible to verify the reported failure (endoscope distal tip broke off) from the photos provided.No samples was returned for investigation.The possible cause for the reported failure could be due to the distal end becoming bent and lodged inside the dlt, resulting in breakage during withdrawal.According to the ifu, the distal tip must be in a non-deflected position when withdrawing the endoscope, and the control lever should not be operated during withdrawal.Ambu production and qc performs 100% visual inspection on the ascope and the scope was verified in good condition prior to shipment.Production.Technical team and quality control have been made aware of this feedback via quality alert.
 
Event or Problem Description
During a vats surgical procedure that our a5 2.7mm endoscope distal tip broke off into the patients endotracheal tube.Anesthesia team went in and retrieved the piece that had broken off.Patient condition was not affected by the failure.
 
Event or Problem Description
During a vats surgical procedure that our a5 2.7mm endoscope distal tip broke off into the patients endotracheal tube.Anesthesia team went in and retrieved the piece that had broken off.Patient condition was not affected by the failure.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Initial mdr report: during investigation it was possible to verify the reported failure (endoscope distal tip broke off) from the photos provided.No samples was returned for investigation.The possible cause for the reported failure could be due to the distal end becoming bent and lodged inside the dlt, resulting in breakage during withdrawal.According to the ifu, the distal tip must be in a non-deflected position when withdrawing the endoscope, and the control lever should not be operated during withdrawal.Ambu production and qc performs 100% visual inspection on the ascope and the scope was verified in good condition prior to shipment.Production.Technical team and quality control have been made aware of this feedback via quality alert.Follow-up mdr report: actual device was received for investigation december 15, 2025 and the already conducted investigation results was therefore revised.Based on the returned sample it was now possible to also verify the reported failure (endoscope distal tip broke off) from the returned sample.The possible cause for the reported failure could be due to the distal end becoming bent and lodged inside the dlt, resulting in breakage during withdrawal.The codes for type of investigation, investigation findings and investigation conclusion in h6 have been updated accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ASCOPE 5 BRONCHO 2.7/1.2
Common Device Name
ASCOPE 5 BRONCHO 2.7/1.2
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMBU A/S
baltorpbakken 13
ballerup, 2750
DA  2750
Manufacturer (Section G)
AMBU SDN. BHD.
lot 69-b, lintang
bayan lepas 6, phase iv
penang, 1900
MY   1900
Manufacturer Contact
bolette walldorf
baltorpbakken 13
ballerup, 2750
DA   2750
MDR Report Key23740214
Report Number9610691-2025-00030
Device Sequence Number10209701
Product Code EOQ
UDI-Device Identifier05707480157280
UDI-Public05707480157280
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateGA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K233671
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Administrator/Supervisor
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/13/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number624001000US
Device Lot Number1001106302
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/10/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/15/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/08/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/13/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/13/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-