| Model Number |
0174 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
High impedance (1291); High Capture Threshold (3266)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/25/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this right ventricular (rv) lead was explanted and replaced.The lead exhibited pacing impedance gradually increasing, as well as, pacing thresholds which also gradually increased.The lead was confirmed to have fracture.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this right ventricular (rv) lead was explanted and replaced.The lead exhibited pacing impedance gradually increasing, as well as, pacing thresholds which also gradually increased.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this right ventricular (rv) lead was explanted and replaced.The lead exhibited pacing impedance gradually increasing, as well as, pacing thresholds which also gradually increased.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Good faith effort attempts were made to try and retrieve the device, however a response was not received.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|