• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE PEEK W/CORD; SCREW, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE PEEK W/CORD; SCREW, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 222303
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a rotator cuff repair surgical procedure, when inserting the 4.5 healix advance peek w/cord anchor device, it was observed that the anchor was broken off.It was reported that all the broken parts were removed.Another device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information could be provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: investigation summary the product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found the anchor deformed and stripped.The suture was not returned for evaluation.Additionally, the device had foreign matter, presumably biological matter.No other anomalies were noted.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the 4.5 healix advance br w/ocord would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure.The possible root cause can be associated with off axis insertion and levering during insertion.As per instructions for use (ifu); 1) inserting the awl or drill to less than the specified depth, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion may result in anchor fracture.2) do not apply a bending force to the inserter.This can damage the anchor or inserter tip.3) depuy mitek anchors are designed to lock into cortical or cancellous bone.Bone stock must be adequate to allow proper and secure anchor placement.Incomplete insertion or poor bone quality may result in anchor pullout.4) apply tension (normal force) on suture lengths.Excessive force may overload the anchor or suture.Properly handling and¿attention to the approved use of the device diminishes the risk of failure.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE PEEK W/CORD
Common Device Name
SCREW, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
9083863534
MDR Report Key23770274
Report Number1221934-2025-04703
Device Sequence Number18579773
Product Code HWC
UDI-Device Identifier10886705021390
UDI-Public(01)10886705021390(10)1019RR(17)270430
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K120449
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number222303
Device Lot Number1019RR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/01/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/17/2025
12/22/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/10/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/18/2025
01/05/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/28/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
Yes
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-