|
Product analysis ¿ as found condition: the navien was returned within a shipping box and a plastic bio-pouch.¿ visual inspection/damage location details: no damage was found with the navien catheter hub.The navien catheter¿s body was found to be broken at ~104.5cm from proximal end of hub.The navien distal tip was found to be damaged.¿ testing/analysis: the navien catheter total length was measured to be ~122.6cm and the usable length was measured to be ~116.2cm, which is within specification.A 0.05¿ mandrel was used to test on the navien catheter, and resistance was observed at the kinked/damaged section of the catheter.The navien was then flushed, and no material was found to be occluding the catheter.¿ conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s ¿catheter kink/damage¿ and ¿catheter resistance¿ were confirmed as kink/damage and resistance were observed along the damaged area of the navien catheter.In addition, catheter separation/break and marker band damage were also confirmed as separation occurred at the kinked area and crush/flatten damage was observed at the distal tip.Catheter kink/damage can be caused by patient vessel tortuosity, delivery system removed aggressively, catheter entrapment, advancing and retrieving intraluminal device against resistance.Catheter resistance can be caused by patient vessel tortuosity, incompatible devices, material occludes catheter, guidewire damage, lack of continuous saline flush during delivery, or lack of hydration prior to use.Catheter separation/break can be caused by advancing and retrieving intraluminal device against resistance, vasospasm, patient vessel tortuosity, entrapment in vessel, or excessive force.Marker band damage can be caused by patient vessel tortuosity, advancing and retrieving intraluminal device against resistance, vessel calcification or stenosis.Information regarding if continuous saline flush was maintained, catheter entrapment occurred, excessive force was used, vasospasm occurred, calcification or stenosis was present, or if there was advancement or retrieval of an intraluminal device against resistance was not reported, potentially ruling out these causes.Flushing was performed and there was no material occluding the catheter which can also be ruled out the potential cause.In addition, the make/model of the microcatheter was not reported.Therefore, an analysis could not be performed, and any contributing factors (including incompatible devices) could not be assessed.In the event, it is also possible that the patient¿s moderate vessel tortuosity may have contributed to the reported event.However, the root cause could not be determined.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Medtronic received a report that after puncturing and placing the sheath, the surgeon exchanged the support catheter and removed the radial sheath.He then used the super-smooth guide wire to guide the navien support catheter directly to the c3 segment of the internal carotid artery.After the stent microcatheter was in place, he placed the echelon microcatheter and found that the intermediate catheter could not be delivered.The guidewire was then withdrawn and the echelon microcatheter delivery was attempted, but delivery was still unsuccessful.After all systems were withdrawn, it was discovered that the middle section of the terminal catheter was severely kinked.The surgeon then attempted transradial treatment using a high-performance long sheath but was unsuccessful, and the femoral artery was re-punctured for treatment.The device and any accessories were prepared as indicated in the ifu.The catheter was flushed as indicated in the ifu.The catheter was kinked in the middle.The patient is alive with no injury.The patient was undergoing surgery for transradial artery aneurysm embolization treatment.The access vessel was after radial artery, femoral artery.It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was moderate.Additional information was received reporting that the lesion characteristics were posterior communicating artery location, other unknown.No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The cause of the resistance and damage was not determined.The report that "the surgeon then attempted transradial treatment using a high-performance long sheath but was unsuccessful, and the femoral artery was re-punctured for treatment" was stated to have nothing to do with medtronic device and was a remedial measure after the complete withdrawal of medtronic device.Both the femoral and radial arteries had been prepped for the procedure.It was clarified that the navien had the kink.Ancillary devices include a terumo radial sheath.
|