|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
3542751 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
09/08/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On january 30, 2026, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The patient identifier was also provided and has been populated.The patient's implant was replaced with a mentor gel implant.On february 17, 2026, the product investigation was completed.Device investigation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted visual inspection, leak testing and microscopic examination of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned device revealed that the breast implant had a tear (tear a) on the posterior view, measuring approximately 7.8 cm.In addition, an area of siltex cracking on the posterior view.Leak testing was performed, according with mentor procedure, and it revealed a second tear, tear b, within the siltex cracking, measuring approximately 0.3 cm.No more areas of gel exposure were observed.Microscopic examination was performed on the edges of the tear a, and parallel striations were found in the whole area of the tear.Parallel striations are consistent with markings made by a sharp object perforating the implant shell.The evaluation determined that the possible cause of the tear b is consistent with normal wear.Siltex cracking is defined as a material separation occurring in the siltex layer and can eventually progress through the shell of siltex devices.Siltex cracking is ultimately a result of high stresses.Based on the information currently available, microscopic examination of the returned product indicates that the implant could have been damaged during or subsequent to implantation.The product insert data sheet cautions to not allow cautery devices or sharp instruments, such as scalpels, suture needles, hypodermic needles, hemostats, adson forceps or scissors to contact the device during the implantation or other surgical procedures.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria, and that normal wear may have caused the observed defect.No corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D4: udi: as the serial number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: material rupture.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent breast augmentation with a 275cc mentor memorygel breast implant on the right breast side.Post-operatively, the patient was diagnosed, via ultrasound, with right breast implant rupture.As a result, the patient underwent breast implant removal and replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2025.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|