|
It was reported that during setup the strain relief of the stealth 360 peripheral orbital atherectomy device (oad) separated from the oad.It was unknown what caused the damage.The oad was loaded onto a viperwire advance guide wire that was in vivo at the time of event.Additionally, the oad driveshaft was stretched and the crown broke off in the sheath.The sheath was removed quickly from the patient, along with the crown inside.The oad was replaced to complete the procedure.Manual pressure was applied for hemostasis as no closure device was utilized in the laboratory.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|
|
A visual inspection, functional testing and detailed analysis were performed on the returned device.The reported detached strain relief and crown material separation were confirmed.The reported stretched driveshaft was not confirmed.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot-specific issue.Based on the reported information and the observations from the returned analysis, the investigation determined that the reported crown separation appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.Detailed analysis shows the presence of solder at the crown bond location on the driveshaft and the crown internal diameter, indicating that the crown had been bonded to the driveshaft.The cause of the damage remains undetermined, and the detached strain relief appears to be unrelated to the separated crown.Based on the results of the complaint investigation there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.Updated: e1-phone number, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6 (codes 4755, 4118, 3233, and 11 no longer apply).
|
|
It was reported that during setup the strain relief of the stealth 360 peripheral orbital atherectomy device (oad) separated from the oad.It was unknown what caused the damage.The oad was loaded onto a viperwire advance guide wire that was in vivo at the time of event.Additionally, the oad driveshaft was stretched and the crown broke off in the sheath.The sheath was removed quickly from the patient, along with the crown inside.The oad was replaced to complete the procedure.Manual pressure was applied for hemostasis as no closure device was utilized in the laboratory.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|