|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.H3 investigation summary: the product was returned to eth for evaluation.Visual inspection revealed that twenty unopened samples were received for analysis.The product code sxpp2b436 is double armed.As per the sampling plan, a visual inspection was performed on thirteen samples, and the packets were opened.The swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The sutures were dispensed and examined along the strands and no anomalies were observed during evaluation.Functional test was performed using instron equipment, and during the test two needles came off from the suture during handling.The pull force of the remaining eleven samples met requirements.The inspection of the two failed samples revealed short insertion.Per the conditions observed in the sutures, the remaining seven samples were test using instron equipment, and the pull force meet with the requirements.Based on the information currently available, short insertion issue was identified as pull out during the investigation of the sample received.This product issue will be addressed through the ethicon quality system.H3 analysis: the product was returned to eth for evaluation.Visual inspection revealed that one labeled winding former with a detached needle and one needle suture that pertains to prouduct code sxpp2b436.This product code is double armed.Upon visual inspection of the detached needle, the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The barrel hole was examined under magnification, and no suture remnant was noted.In addition, the needle suture was visually inspected, and the swage area was noted to be as expected.The suture was examined a short insertion was observed at the end of the strand.The visual inspection concluded that the combination of the needle/suture was detached from the needle since the insertion end of the suture did not meet the requirement.The product was returned for evaluation and the identified issue will be addressed through the quality system; no patient or user adverse outcomes were reported in the investigation summary.Based on the information currently available, a product issue was identified during the investigation of the sample received.This product issue will be addressed through eth quality system.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained via: - how many devices demonstrated the alleged deficiency? 3.- did the event occur during one or multiple patient procedures? 2 patients.- what is the total number of procedures? 2 procedures.- have any of these events been previously reported to ethicon? if so, could you please provide the corresponding reference number(s)? no, this was the first time the events had been reported to me or any other ethicon rep.File reviewed.Dhr review activity created.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information requested at this time.- were there any unexpected outcomes or complications resulting from the prolonged surgery time? no.- which tissue was being sutured when the event occurred? fascia.- was additional dissection required in other organs/tissues other than the target tissue? no.- was there any change in the patient¿s post operative care due to the prolonged procedure? no.- did the reported issue contribute to any patient adverse consequences? no.- could you kindly perform the follow-up attempt for the product return? please ensure that the shipment tracking number is provided: i do not have tracking #, but i used the shipping label created here for shipment.- please provide the source or name of person providing answers to follow-up questions: (b)(4).Additional h11: surgeon reported that the needle kept pulling off of surture strand when pulling through tissue without any strain on the needle.This happened with 3 stands in the same case.Pa confirmed that this is what happened - that it happened with just driving through and that they didn't really pull on the needle yet at all.They both said this happened in a case last week.A surgical tech said the same thing happened with a different surgeon last week as well.I have identified one likely lot number for all occurrences.Was surgery delayed due to the reported event? yes, if yes, number of minutes: 5, action taken when event occurred? kept trying more sutures until they got one that worked.Was procedure successfully completed? yes, were fragments generated? no, if yes, were they removed easily without additional intervention? unknown, if no, explain: suture came out whole and nothing left behind.Patient status/ outcome / consequences? no, was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: unknown, is the patient part of a clinical study? unknown, (b)(4).Device property of? none, device in possession o? none.
|