• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN SONICISION; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN SONICISION; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number SCDA39
Medical Device Problem Codes Difficult or Delayed Activation (2577); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/05/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during procedure, the dissector worked fine at first, then intermittently and after 5 minutes when the dissector was removed from the cavity, they noticed the dissector's tip was fractured.A red light was observed when the issue occurred.The procedure was completed using a laparoscopic l-hook.Nothing fell on patient's cavity.There was no patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h3 h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the dissector has a damaged waveguide.The device showed evidence of use.The waveguide was detached and returned.Functional testing found that the assembled device returned a green light and produced a welcome tone.The assembled device immediately alarmed when activated.The waveguide was inspected under magnification and the origin of the crack was identified.Investigation personnel concluded that the titanium waveguide became cracked from continued use after it may have come in contact with a metallic object.Use after damage can cause the cracked waveguide to break off.It was reported that the device component was disengaged and the device was difficult or has intermittent activation.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: contact between the active blade and other metal objects (hemostats, clips, staples, retractors, etc.) may result in product damage, such as a broken blade.Pieces of a broken blade may fall into the surgical cavity causing unintended tissue damage.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6.H3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the dissector has a damaged waveguide.The device showed evidence of use.The waveguide was detached and returned.Functional testing found that the assembled device returned a green light and produced a welcome tone.The assembled device immediately alarmed when activated.The waveguide was inspected under magnification and the origin of the crack was identified.Investigation personnel concluded that the titanium waveguide became cracked from continued use after it may have come in contact with a metallic object.Use after damage can cause the cracked waveguide to break off.It was reported that the device component was disengaged and the device was difficult or has intermittent activation.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SONICISION
Common Device Name
INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
6044 longbow court
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
6044 longbow court
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer Contact
mike bocchino
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112-4391
8006464633
MDR Report Key23802920
Report Number1717344-2025-01603
Device Sequence Number18475052
Product Code LFL
UDI-Device Identifier10884521592841
UDI-Public(01)10884521592841(17)300309(10)50640221X
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryDR
PMA/510(K) Number
K180149
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/24/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberSCDA39
Device Catalogue NumberSCDA39
Device Lot Number50640221X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/19/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/23/2026
06/23/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/15/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/24/2026
06/24/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/10/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age44 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-