| Catalog Number |
72290134 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Activation Failure (3270)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/25/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known risks with the device itself or with its use that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a tonsillectomy procedure, the coblation halo wand was not ablating at all, even though saline delivery was applied.The procedure was resumed, with a delay greater than 30 minutes, using a similar s+n back-up.The patient was exposed to further anesthesia.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a tonsillectomy procedure, the coblation halo wand was not ablating at all, even though saline delivery was applied.The procedure was resumed, with a delay greater than 30 minutes, using a similar s+n back-up.The patient was exposed to further anesthesia.No further complications were reported.The patient status is fine.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H11.B5: event description updated.H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed no manufacturing abnormalities.Product was out of the original packaging.No packaging returned.The wand has heavy bio debris in the tubings and on the tip from use.A functional evaluation was performed on the returned device and found the wand had no issues producing plasma or activating coag.The wand had no issues activating.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the investigation.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|