|
On december 16, 2025, device evaluation was completed as follows; mentor conducted a visual inspection, and microscopic examination of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned device revealed that the breast implant was found to have a tear on the posterior view, measuring approximately 1.8 cm.Microscopic examination was performed and the cause of the deflation could not be identified.Mentor also performed a manufacturing record evaluation related to the reported complaint for the finished device lot number.No manufacturing non-conformances were identified as part of this evaluation.Although no conclusion could be reach on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use contain the following caution: causes of deflation of saline implants include but are not limited to the following events: crease fold failure, intraoperative or postoperative trauma, excessive stresses or manipulations as may occur during normal, daily routines including customary and purposeful trauma such as that which can occur during vigorous exercise, athletics, etc.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria: no corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.D4: udi: as the serial number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
It was reported that a 61-year-old caucasian female patient underwent primary breast augmentation with 275cc mentor siltex round moderate profile and experienced breast implant deflation on her left side postoperatively; diagnosed after physical exam.The patient has consulted with the healthcare professional.As a result, the patient is scheduled for surgery on (b)(6) 2025.On (b)(6) 2025, the mentor failure analysis lab received the two devices with same lot number engraved and were both found damaged upon evaluation.Hence, this report details investigation results for the second (right side) as malfunction since no issue was reported for the right side.
|