|
SYNTHES GMBH MOD TRINKLE REAMING ATTACHMENT F/BPL; MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
530.783 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/26/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: e1: complete facility name: (b)(6) hospital.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during post-surgery cleaning, it was discovered that a part came off the reaming attachment device.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H11.Additional narrative: the device was functionally / visually tested according to the service manual.The described failure by the customer could be confirmed.The device was visually inspected as received from the customer.It was found that the device failed visual inspection.Due to device fell apart and the red indication ring for ream was missing.Following test failed according to the pre-diagnostic assessment: general condition: fail.Markings: fail.Check function of collar on tool coupling: fail.Check tool coupling: fail.Check general function in running mode: n/a.Check for run-out inspection in running mode: n/a.Following failure could be identified: the device was visually and functionally assessed, and it was found that the device fell apart and the red indication ring for ream was missing.Due to this other test steps could not be performed.Root cause comments: the most probable root cause for the found failure can be linked to normal wear; this is supported by the fact that the device was never serviced since manufacturing in january 2016.As part of synthes quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The ifu states the following regarding the reported issue that was observed by the user or customer: servicing this system requires regular maintenance service, at least once a year, in order to maintain its functionality.This service has to be performed by the original manufacturer or an authorized site.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.The device has not been previously serviced.Device history record shows the lot was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Device history review: review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|