• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 1 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 1 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33630021
Medical Device Problem Code Osseointegration Problem (3003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Date of Event 11/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the available information the device will not be returned therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to the talus is causing the patient a lot of pain and appears to be loosening.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to the talus is causing the patient a lot of pain and appears to be loosening.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint couldn't be confirmed, since the returned image for evaluation don't matches the alleged failure.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed: there is no clear loosening visible for both the tibia and the talus.The talus, however, seems to be lateralized and have a conflict with the fibula.The medial part looks a little distanced from the medial malleolus.It could be that there is loosening (although not be visible in the ct scan) and that led to the problem.A comparison with pre-existing x-ray or ct scan would be necessary to prove this.I would assume, that the problem is related to both the patient and poor bone substance, but also to a lateral positioning of the implant and therefore a treatment related issue.Failure of total ankle replacement tar over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In cases where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information e.G., clinical status, exact symptoms, and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and or the device in relation to cause of the failure.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Although the issue is most likely related to patient condition or treatment, the root cause could not be conclusively determined.More detailed information about the complaint event must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 1 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
dannielle stap
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key23831951
Report Number3010667733-2025-01536
Device Sequence Number13019378
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420122025
UDI-Public(01)00840420122025(11)180828(17)260826(10)1634357
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
K123954
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/23/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/26/2026
Device Catalogue Number33630021
Device Lot Number1770147
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/20/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/26/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/17/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/23/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-