• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DCB00
Medical Device Problem Codes Crack (1135); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/21/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded, monofocal, intraocular lens (iol) did not release the lens properly.The surgeon observed that the tip of the device did not look as it should.Balance salt solution (bss) was used to prime the device.Account indicated that the tip of the cartridge made contact with the patient but the iol was completely stuck inside the injector.No patient injury occurred.No medical or surgical interventions were required.The procedure was completed using a back up device without further issue.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3, a4, and a5: per regulation eu 2016/679 (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section d6a - implant date: n/a - lens was not implanted.Section d6b - explant date: n/a - lens was not implanted.Section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9 - date returned to manufacturer: 06-jan-2026.Section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection revealed that the lens was stuck in the cartridge and overridden by the plunger rod.A crack was observed on the cartridge extending to the cartridge tip.Viscoelastic was observed inside the cartridge.The plunger rod, lens module, and handpiece were inspected, and no issues were identified.The lens could not be removed from the cartridge for further evaluation.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key23835004
Report Number3012236936-2025-000327
Device Sequence Number14700643
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474635937
UDI-Public(01)05050474635937(17)261204
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/18/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDCB00
Device Catalogue NumberDCB0000125
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/25/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/12/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/17/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/18/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/04/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-