|
|
| Model Number |
FA-55150-1030 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Retraction Problem (1536); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/16/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Continuation of d10: pipeline flex stent, product id: ped-375-18 (lot: d043364).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medtronic received a report that during deployment of the pipeline flex stent, the operator adjusted the anchoring point and attempted to retrieve the stent into the marksman microcatheter for the first time.At this point, the stent had overlapped, and there was some resistance in the distal catheter during retrieval.The surgeon suspected the stent was damaged so the stent and microcatheter were replaced with the same model stent from a different lot and a phenom 27 microcatheter to complete the procedure.No patient symptoms or complications were associated with this event.The patient was undergoing dense mesh flow diversion surgery for treatment of an unruptured, amorphous, aneurysm in the right c7 segment with a max diameter of 3.1 mm and a 2 mm neck diameter.The landing zone arterial diameter was 2.5 mm distally and 3.7 mm proximally.It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was moderate.Dual antiplatelet treatment (dapt) was administered.The angiographic result post procedure was reported as normal.Right femoral artery access vessel diameter was 7 mm.The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).The pipeline was used for an approved indication (on-label).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received stating that the marksman catheter was initially used to deploy the stent, but resistance was encountered at the distal section of the catheter.The marksman catheter was then replaced with a phenom 27 microcatheter (model: fg15150-0615-1s, lot number: 230755171).The cause of the stent overlap and the resistance was not determined.Friction or difficulty was noted during delivery or positioning.A continuous saline flush was administered and maintained as indicated in the ifu.No damage to the pipeline pushwire or catheter was observed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis #(b)(4): equipment used: video inspection system (m-78210), ruler 200cm (m-83361) drawing(s) referenced: (b)(4).R as found condition: the pipeline flex pushwire and marksman catheter were returned for analysis within a shipping box; and within a plastic bio-pouch.The pipeline flex pushwire was returned within the marksman catheter.The pipeline flex braid was not returned for analysis.Therefore, any contributing factors could not be assessed.Damage location details: the pushwire extending out from catheter hub.In addition, the sleeves and tip coil were deployed from catheter distal tip.No bent or kink was found with pushwire.The distal hypotube and ptfe shrink tubing were found to be intact with no signs of elongation.The dps sleeves were found intact with no signs of damage.No defects were found with the distal marker, re-sheathing marker, re-sheathing pad or with the proximal bumper and tip coil.No flash or voids molded were observed in the hub.No damage was found with hub.No bent or kink was found with catheter body.The marksman catheter tip and marker were examined; and no damage was found.No other anomalies were observed.Testing/analysis: the pushwire was pushed out from catheter without any issue.The total and usable lengths of marksman catheter were measured to be within specifications.The catheter was flushed with water and water exited out of the distal tip.The catheter was then tested by running an in-house 0.0265¿ mandrel through catheter tip and hub.The mandrel successfully passed through the catheter hub and tip with no issues.Conclusion: based on the analysis findings, the pipeline flex and marksman catheter could not be confirmed to have resistance delivery/ retrieval as no defect were found with the pipeline flex pushwire and marksman catheter.No resistance was observed during testing.Possible causes include damaged catheter, burrs, bumps, kinks or other damage on ped or pushwire, frayed ends on braid, patient vessel tortuosity, user does not maintain continuous flush, and users pulls back on/torques wire while advancing ped in microcatheter.The patient's vessel tortuosity was moderate, and the catheter was continually flushed with heparanized saline as indicated in the ifu.Which eliminates these factors out as potential causes.The pipeline flex braid was not returned for analysis.Therefore, any contributing factors could not be assessed.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|