|
Product complaint#: (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 12/18/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformance's were identified.Additional information was requested; the following was obtained: what measures were taken to retrieve the broken piece? was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece? if not retrieved, in what tissue structure the needle was retained? is there any plan in place to remove the needle in the future? please provide details.Please provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep or loc/bq).Please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections.An x-ray machine was brought into the or to locate the broken needle, and it was successfully retrieved.There was no additional tissue damage while searching for the needle.The person reporting was the operating room senior nurse of (b)(6) hospital (b)(6).Unfortunately, i could not create a shipping label and am currently working with iris to resolve this issue, if you could provide any assistance on that regard, i would be highly appreciative of your help.The following information was reported: in summary: needle of item code w742g was broken during facial closure in an appendectomy case.Was surgery delayed due to the reported event? no, action taken when event occurred? x-ray was called to remove needle fragment, was procedure successfully completed? yes, were fragments generated? yes, if yes, were they removed easily without additional intervention? yes, patient status/ outcome / consequences: no, was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: yes, if yes, describe: x-ray was used to locate needle fragment and removal, is the patient part of a clinical study? unknown.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an appendectomy procedure on (b)(6) 2025 and suture was used.It was reported that needle broke during facial closure at umbilical cord site during a laparoscopic appendectomy case.The port was removed before the surgeon began suturing and three different pieces were used, two needles broke, one during the first bite and one needle bent at the needle holder site.Xray was used to retain the needle that was broken inside the patient.There were no patient consequences reported.Additional information was requested.
|