• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRT150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Dry Eye(s) (1814); Blurred Vision (2137); Eye Pain (4467)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The drt150 model intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient¿s ocular dexter (right eye).Post operatively, the patient reports her vision has slightly improved from blurry to fuzzy since the initial surgery.She is unable to read, her eye stings, and feels tired; she described it as like she had an eyelash in her eye.After resting, her eyes feel better but vision is still fuzzy.The patient also reports sensitivity to bright colors, which has led her to unscrew light bulbs in her home to ease the discomfort.The patient also experiences dry eye, which she was informed is a side effect, and uses eye drops for relief and she takes gabapentin for osteoarthritis.Her ophthalmologist confirmed that the lenses were placed correctly, advising that it may take 3-6 months for her brain to adjust to the implants.The suspect iol is not available for return as it remains implanted.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section a-3b patient gender: female.Section a-4 patient weight: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section a-5 patient ethnicity: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section a-6 patient race: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section b-3 date of event: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section d-6b date explanted: not applicable as the iol remains implanted; therefore, not explanted.Section h-3 device evaluated by manufacturer: the complaint device was not returned for evaluation as it remains implanted.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch report will be filed.Attempts were made to contact the customer account requesting additional information regarding complaint however, to date no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key23846914
Report Number3012236936-2025-000341
Device Sequence Number9599394
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474811362
UDI-Public(01)05050474811362(17)271017
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 12/19/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRT150
Device Catalogue NumberDRT1500205
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/10/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/18/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/17/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-