|
ETHICON INC. EB EXC GRN 4X30IN 5 S/A V-37; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
MB66G |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 12/19/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.? can you identify the lot number of the product involved? =>unk.? what is current condition of the patient? =>unk.? please provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep or loc/bq) =>(b)(6).? please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections.=>the device has been received at sukagawa and will be shipped.Please check rmao.Tracking number: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on an unknown date and suture was used.During open bipolar hemiarthroplasty, when the doctor tried to suture the ligament, not suture the bones, the needle tip broke unexpectedly.No pieces fell into the patient.The issue was found immediately, so the use was stopped.The hospital has used the product so far, but this was the first time that the needle broke as easily as this.The hospital also said that particularly the product has not been touched the stiff tissues.It was not a control release needle.Another product was used to complete the case.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: h6, d9, h3.H3 investigation summary: the product received for analysis was mb66g visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A failed suture needle, labeled as (b)(4) , was submitted to herrera, stafford and associates, llc (hsa) for fractographic evaluation on december 10, 2025.The component was identified as product code mb66g.It was requested that hsa assess the fracture mode of the failure.A fracture was observed near the tip of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of (b)(4) revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.Mechanical damage was observed coincidental to the fracture provide additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|