• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ3LNG INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ3LNG INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33680013
Medical Device Problem Codes Osseointegration Problem (3003); Implant subsidence (4078)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Fall (1848); Pain (1994); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Date of Event 11/25/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery because the patient fell down the stairs and continues to have pain and swelling.There's concerns for subsidence of the tibial component.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation is completed, any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction - h6 ( device code) the reported event could not be confirmed, since the ct scan does not show any clear signs of loosening or migration for neither the tibial nor the talar component.There is a little radiolucence visible adjacent to both components, but no clear loosening or migration.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Upon further investigation of the ct scans, healthcare professionals opined that- the ct scan does not show any clear signs of loosening or migration for neither the tibial nor the talar component.There is a little radiolucence visible adjacent to both components, but no clear loosening or migration.The patient reports pain and the surgeon is planning to revise for this reason.A potential loosening is suspected, however, there is no clear radiological sign for this.Emphasizing this unclear cause of the revision it must be understood, that nothing can be said regarding a potential underlying cause.There is no evidence, that the issue is device related.However, failure of total ankle replacement tar over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In cases where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information e.G., clinical status, exact symptoms, and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and or the device in relation to cause of the failure.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If the device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery because the patient fell down the stairs and continues to have pain and swelling.There's concerns for subsidence of the tibial component.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ3LNG INFINITY ADAPTIS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
dannielle stap
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key23872998
Report Number3010667733-2025-01552
Device Sequence Number12095068
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00889797069687
UDI-Public(01)00889797069687(11)230811(17)310811(10)1765735
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K181557
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/05/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33680013
Device Lot Number1765735
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/25/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/05/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/22/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/05/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/11/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexFemale
-
-