|
Technical analysis and conclusions it was reported that the extractor was found broken inside the lag screw during the removal of a chimaera nail.X ray images were provided as evidence of the defect.The returned units included the extractor, the lag screw, and the nail.Visual inspection confirmed the fracture of the extractor tip, which remained stuck inside the lag screw.Although inspection of the lag screw suggested that the diameter of the fragment retained inside appeared larger than the nominal diameter of the extractor tip, this was likely influenced by deformation and damage.Both the nail and the lag screw were returned severely damaged; however, this condition may be attributable to the explantation handling performed due to the inability to disengage the lag screw from the nail.According to the relevant instructions for use hf1501opt (nail extractor), the removal of the lag screw can be performed using the screw extractor connected via the universal chuck with t handle, applying a counter clockwise movement until the lag screw is removed.In the reported case, it cannot be excluded that the counter clockwise movement was impeded, most likely due to an inadequate connection.As a consequence, the lag screw wings may not have been properly deployed, and the application of excessive force during the extraction handling likely resulted in the fracture of the extractor.This was supported by the macroscopic fracture analysis of the steel extractor, which showed a large, opaque, and rough fracture surface, indicative of failure under very high applied load (high stress conditions).No similar cases have been reported in the last 24 months; therefore, this event can be considered isolated.
|