• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FLEXOR ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FLEXOR ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G48192
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/19/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during preparation for a procedure involving revascularization of the mesenteric artery, the dilator would not fit into a flexor ansel guiding sheath.The device did not make patient contact, and another system was used.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the sheath shaft material was separated inside the hub.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, during preparation for a procedure involving revascularization of the mesenteric artery, the dilator would not fit into a flexor ansel guiding sheath.The device did not make patient contact, and another system was used.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the sheath shaft material was separated inside the hub.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The sheath was received separated from the hub, and sheath material was noted in the hub.The disc is not dislodged, and no damage was noted to the disc.The dilator was able to be inserted into the hub without any difficulty.The dilator was inserted distally into the sheath without any difficulty.Waviness was noted along the majority of the length of the dilator.A slight bend was noted approximately 12cm from the separated portion of the sheath.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record and complaint history found no discrepancies or additional relevant complaints in the final or sub-assembly lots.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the returned device, complaint file, dmr, and dhr suggests that there is evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to this incident.It is possible that dilator caught on the flare while advancing through the sheath, contributing to the separation; however, this cannot be definitively determined with the available information.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed, and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLEXOR ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key23877542
Report Number1820334-2025-01599
Device Sequence Number14620000
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002481923
UDI-Public(01)00827002481923(17)271119(10)16347221
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
PMA/510(K) Number
K142829
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/26/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG48192
Device Catalogue NumberKCFW-5.0-18/38-110-RB-ANL0-HC
Device Lot Number16347221
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/16/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/16/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/20/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/23/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/26/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/19/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-