• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA? 40; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA? 40; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number S404
Medical Device Problem Code Interrogation Problem (4017)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/05/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker has been implanted for over 15 years.The device still has battery remaining but is unable to be interrogated.At this time the device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker has been implanted for over 15 years.The device still has battery remaining but is unable to be interrogated.At this time the device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of difficult to interrogate/telemetry (wand) was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of no problem detected.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker has been implanted for over 15 years.The device still has battery remaining but is unable to be interrogated.At this time the device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information obtained, this device was explanted and replaced due to normal battery depletion (nbd).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of difficult to interrogate/telemetry (wand) was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of no problem detected.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of difficult to interrogate/telemetry (wand) was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of no problem detected.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker has been implanted for over 15 years.The device still has battery remaining but is unable to be interrogated.At this time the device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information obtained, this device was explanted and replaced due to normal battery depletion (nbd).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALTRUA? 40
Common Device Name
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key23881933
Report Number2124215-2025-92752
Device Sequence Number9605273
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526484452
UDI-Public(01)00802526484452(17)121122
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
N970003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2011
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/29/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/22/2012
Device Model NumberS404
Device Catalogue NumberS404
Device Lot Number597095
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/05/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/23/2026
04/07/2026
04/29/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/23/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/24/2026
04/16/2026
04/29/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/24/2010
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-