| Model Number |
72400163 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Mechanical Problem (1384); Difficult or Delayed Activation (2577)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Urinary Incontinence (4572)
|
| Date of Event |
08/25/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Concomitant product udi for balloon is (b)(4).Concomitant product udi for pump is (b)(4).The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.There was no report of a device performance allegation.The reported patient symptom of incontinence is a known risk associated with this device type and indicated as such in the instructions for use.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this artificial urinary sphincter (aus) was experiencing persistent urinary incontinence following implantation.Approximately one month after the procedure, an attempt was made to activate the device without success.A subsequent attempt was made during which the balloon was observed to empty; however, the cuff did not fill, and urethral coaptation was not achieved.The pump was reported to fill and empty, but fluid was not delivered to the cuff, and the cuff remained unchanged.There were no further patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Concomitant product udi for balloon is (b)(4).Concomitant product udi for pump is (b)(4).The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.The device history record (dhr) review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A review of the device instructions for use (ifu) was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off label use, or failure to follow instructions.Based on the information available the cause that contributed to the reported event cannot be established, therefore a conclusion code of unable to exclude device problem was assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this artificial urinary sphincter (aus) was experiencing persistent urinary incontinence following implantation.Approximately one month after the procedure, an attempt was made to activate the device without success.A subsequent attempt was made during which the balloon was observed to empty; however, the cuff did not fill, and urethral coaptation was not achieved.The pump was reported to fill and empty, but fluid was not delivered to the cuff, and the cuff remained unchanged.There were no further patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this artificial urinary sphincter (aus) was experiencing persistent urinary incontinence following implantation.Approximately one month after the procedure, an attempt was made to activate the device without success.A subsequent attempt was made during which the balloon was observed to empty; however, the cuff did not fill, and urethral coaptation was not achieved.The pump was reported to fill and empty, but fluid was not delivered to the cuff, and the cuff remained unchanged.There were no further patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to correct the adverse event/product problem field (b1), date of event field (b3), other relevant history field (b7) in section b, adverse event/product prob; concomitant product/therapy field (c2/d10) in section d, suspect medical device; concomitant information (h11), device analysis in field (h11) in section h, device manufactures only.Model number/catalog number: 72400024,
batch/lot number: 1100553610,
model/catalog description: balloon fgs 61-70 cm,
unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).Model number/catalog number: 72400098 ,
batch/lot number: 1100621547,
model/catalog description: control pump fgs,
unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.The device history record (dhr) review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications prior to distribution.A review of the device instructions for use (ifu) was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off label use, or failure to follow instructions.The reported patient symptom is known risk associated with this device type and indicated as such in the instructions for use.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of urinary incontinence, fluid leak, mechanical issue, and failure to activate was defined in the product risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of unable to exclude device problem was assigned to this investigation.This record was identified during a retrospective review of complaint events; an electronic medical device report (emdr) was not previously submitted per applicable reporting criteria.Boston scientific has opened a nonconforming events and prevention investigation (ncep-00181844) to determine the potential cause for why an emdr was not previously submitted to the food and drug administration (fda) in accordance with boston scientific's established medical device reporting process and fda adverse event reporting requirements.Information gained through these investigation efforts will be utilized to take action(s), as necessary.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|