• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. 2008T HD SYS. CDX W/BIBAG BLUE STAR; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. 2008T HD SYS. CDX W/BIBAG BLUE STAR; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 191126
Medical Device Problem Code Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/23/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: the plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.
 
Event or Problem Description
A user facility biomedical technician (bmt) reported the deaeration motor seized and burned up (melting damage) during dialysis treatment mode.There were no adverse reactions with the patient and the patient completed treatment on another device.No blood loss was reported.The bmt stated the deaeration motor had been running for about 24,000 machine hours.The resulting machine symptoms were a low flow error and a bibag: pressure too low alarm.The motor was replaced and the machine was running with no further issues.Upon follow-up, the bmt stated the deaeration motor was replaced to resolve the reported issue.The machine is back in service.It is confirmed there was patient involvement with this issue and the patient was switched onto another machine to complete treatment and there was no harm or adverse event reported.The bmt stated a burning smell was noted and there were no signs of any smoke, sparks, or flames, and no other components were noted to have been burnt or charred.The bmt stated no other components were observed to be damaged.It was confirmed the machine was plugged into a hospital grade ground-fault circuit interrupter (gfci) outlet.The bmt stated the machine had no previous history of failing the electrical leakage test.The damaged deaeration motor was discarded and was no longer available to be returned for evaluation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.Complaint investigation found objective evidence indicating a product problem, thus the complaint is confirmed.
 
Event or Problem Description
A user facility biomedical technician (bmt) reported the deaeration motor seized and burned up (melting damage) during dialysis treatment mode.There were no adverse reactions with the patient and the patient completed treatment on another device.No blood loss was reported.The bmt stated the deaeration motor had been running for about 24,000 machine hours.The resulting machine symptoms were a low flow error and a bibag: pressure too low alarm.The motor was replaced and the machine was running with no further issues.Upon follow-up, the bmt stated the deaeration motor was replaced to resolve the reported issue.The machine is back in service.It is confirmed there was patient involvement with this issue and the patient was switched onto another machine to complete treatment and there was no harm or adverse event reported.The bmt stated a burning smell was noted and there were no signs of any smoke, sparks, or flames, and no other components were noted to have been burnt or charred.The bmt stated no other components were observed to be damaged.It was confirmed the machine was plugged into a hospital grade ground-fault circuit interrupter (gfci) outlet.The bmt stated the machine had no previous history of failing the electrical leakage test.The damaged deaeration motor was discarded and was no longer available to be returned for evaluation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2008T HD SYS. CDX W/BIBAG BLUE STAR
Common Device Name
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V.
mike allen #1331
parque industrial reynosa
reynosa 88780
MX  88780
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V.
director, quality systems
900 w zaragosa drive suite d
pharr TX 78577
Manufacturer Contact
jessica trujillo
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
6174175172
MDR Report Key23898433
Report Number0008030665-2025-03101
Device Sequence Number10388885
Product Code KDI
UDI-Device Identifier00840861102099
UDI-Public00840861102099
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K173972
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Initial Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/09/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Catalogue Number191126
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device AgeMO
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/23/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/09/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/26/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/09/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/20/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
FRESENIUS BLOODLINES; FRESENIUS BLOODLINES; FRESENIUS DIALYZER; FRESENIUS DIALYZER
Patient SexUnknown
-
-