| Catalog Number |
5950007 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
02/09/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralex st mesh (device 2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralex st mesh (device 3) and supplemental was submitted to represent ventralex st mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per information provided: on (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with left lower quadrant hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex st mesh (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿an incision was made into the lower abdomen.The hernia sac was dissected out.A ventralex st mesh (device 2) was placed into the defect and secure it with sutures.¿ on (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent left incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of synthetic mesh.On (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent abdominal wall hernia, pain thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex st mesh (device 3) and explant of synthetic mesh and ventralex st mesh (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿a transverse incision was made through the previously marked area.The hernia sac was dissected out.Previously placed synthetic mesh and ventralex st mesh (device 2) was removed entirely.A ventralex st mesh (device 3) was placed into the preperitoneal space and secure it with sutures.¿ on (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with pain thereby underwent open repair with explant of ventralex st mesh (device 3) and primary closer of abdominal wall.Per operative notes, ¿a small incision was made into the left upper quadrant just above the umbilicus through previous incision.There was no hernia sac present.Previously placed ventralex st mesh (device 3) was removed.The defect was closed primarily.¿ as per previous legal claim, attorney alleges that patient underwent implant of ventralex st mesh (device 1) on (b)(6) 2007.(note: there was no information/ op notes provided regarding the ventralex st mesh (device 1) which was implanted on (b)(6) 2007 in medical records).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|