|
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).The following fields have been updated: b4: date of this report b5: describe event or problem g3: date received by manufacturer g6: type of report h1: type of reportable event h2: follow up type h3: device evaluated by manufacturer h6: adverse event problem h11: additional narrative zimvie received one (1) tsvmb11, (imp,tsv,mcol mg,3.7mm,11.5mml) for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed; the implant has signs of use with bone attached to its external threads.It also had debris on its internal threads.The implant was trephined with some damage from removal.There were no signs of malfunction that would have contributed to the event.Measurements match drawing.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 1277814.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 1277814 for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: ¿dental : functional : implant position inadequate¿ based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was inadequate treatment planning.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did not occur.No damage to the implant was identified.The reported event was non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.
|