| Model Number |
72404230 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Erosion (1750)
|
| Date of Event |
10/01/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient with an inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) experienced erosion of the cylinder into the urethra.The physician believes the patient left the device activated for prolonged periods.A surgical procedure was performed to remove ipp.No additional patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Concomitant product udi for reservoir is (b)(4).The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.There was no report of a device performance allegation.The reported patient symptom is a known risk associated with this device type and indicated as such in the instructions for use.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient with an inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) experienced erosion of the cylinder into the urethra.The physician believes the patient left the device activated for prolonged periods.A surgical procedure was performed to remove ipp.No additional patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Model number/catalog number 720185-01.Serial number n/a.Batch/lot number 1100598682.Model/catalog description eservoir flat iz 100 ml.Unique identifier (udi) # (b)(4).The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.There was no report of a device performance allegation.The reported patient symptom of erosion is a known risk associated with this device type and indicated as such in the instructions for use.The device history record (dhr) review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A review of the device instructions for use (ifu) was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off label use, or failure to follow instructions.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of erosion was defined in the product risk documentation.This type of event has been accounted for during analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of adverse event related to patient condition was assigned to this investigation as the physician believes the patient left the device activated for prolonged periods, which could lead to erosion of the cylinder in the urethra as a result of leaving the device in an activated state.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|