| Model Number |
B1070-060 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Rupture (1546); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/12/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat the left av graft with severe calcification.The 7x60 mm armada 35 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) catheter was prepped per the instructions for use (ifu), and advanced with resistance noted with the anatomy.The balloon ruptured during the first inflation to 13 atmospheres.There were no adverse patient effects, and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.A non-abbott balloon was used to complete the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Visual inspection and functional testing were performed on the returned device.The reported balloon rupture was confirmed.The reported difficulty advancing the device could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational context.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints from this lot.Based on the reported information and the observations from the returned analysis, the investigation determined that the reported complaints appear to be related to operational context.There was no leak noted to the balloon during preparation, which suggests a product quality issue did not contribute to the reported difficulties.It was reported by the account that the balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) interacted with the heavily calcification anatomy resulting in the reported difficulty advancing the device and subsequently the balloon became damaged and ruptured during inflation.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|