• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT THEON PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT THEON PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 2700TFX
Medical Device Problem Codes Calcified (1077); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 10/06/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported via the implant patient registry that a patient with a 27mm 2700tfx aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of 9 years, 3 months due to unknown reason.The explanted valve was replaced with a 2mm 11500a valve.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the subject device is not available for evaluation, as it has been discarded.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: d4 (expiration date), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6 (investigation findings, and investigation conclusions).Svd is a logical and expected consequence of the chemical, mechanical, and immunological processes associated with bhv implantation.The common endpoint of all these factors is calcification and degradation.Svd is an acquired condition, intrinsic to bioprosthetic valves, characterized by deterioration of the leaflets or supporting structures, leading to thickening, calcification, tearing, or disruption of the prosthetic valve materials.These changes result in valvular dysfunction manifesting as stenosis and/or regurgitation with a consequent drop in hemodynamic efficacy of the valve.Despite the advancements in the heart valve industry, svd commonly begins 7- 8 years after implantation, with a considerably increased rate in patients with pertinent comorbidities and/or an implant duration of greater than 10 years.Prior investigations and extensive literature review have shown that svd is predominantly related to patient factors and implant duration rather than to manufacturing issues.Events related to device design, manufacturing, or use error tend to manifest at an earlier implant duration.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.Based on the information available, the most likely root cause is patient factors, including an implant duration of 7 or more years.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported via the implant patient registry and learned through investigation that a patient with a 27mm 2700tfx aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of 9 years, 3 months due to calcification and degeneration.The explanted valve was replaced with a 27mm 11500a valve.Per medical records, the patient presented with leaflets calcification, structural valve degeneration, with a hole in the r leaflet manifested as severe bioprosthetic valve regurgitation and stenosis.The patient underwent a redo avr and cabg x2 in the same procedure.The valve was removed and replaced with a 27mm 11500a valve.Postoperative echo showed well-seated valve with no paravalvular leak, and the patient tolerated the procedure well with no immediate complications.On pod# 5, the patient was discharged.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: b5, b7, g3, g6, h2, h6 (type of investigation).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT THEON PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
jason reves
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492503859
MDR Report Key23952314
Report Number2015691-2026-10168
Device Sequence Number10725076
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194050
UDI-Public(01)00690103194050(17)200411
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/03/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/11/2020
Device Model Number2700TFX
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/08/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/30/2025
01/31/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/02/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/21/2026
02/03/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/12/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-