| Model Number |
FM300 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Cardiac Arrest (1762)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
We have been informed of the following event: "pressure spiked to 32 towards the end of the case.How was issue noticed: during procedure.Procedure compl successfully: yes.Patient involvement: yes.Medical intervention: yes.Surgical delay: yes.Adverse consequences details: patient coded.Nurse thinks our insufflator was the cause.Not 100% sure.Surgical delay length: not reported.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The event description is very poor and general.Preventive maintenance of the device has been overdue for more than 2 years.At the time of the reporting decision the device was not returned for evaluation.Since there are many different reasons for cardiovascular problems/cardiac arrest during surgeries, including reasons that are independent of the device, and the information available to the manufacturer is insufficient for an assessment in this regard, the most probable root cause cannot be determined.The patient made it through the surgery, and no further complications were reported.Nevertheless, on a conservative approach, since we cannot completely exclude a malfunction of the device, this event is considered as reportable.If new information is received, or if the device is returned for evaluation, the reporting decision will be re-evaluated accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
We have been informed of the following event: additional information was received from (b)(6) on (b)(6) 2026."the reported event occurred during a laparoscopic salpingectomy performed using the insufflator in standard mode with a set pressure of 15 mmhg and regular insufflator tubing.Approximately 30-45 minutes into the procedure (total case time 1 hour 15 minutes), while the surgeon was attempting to access and dissect the fallopian tube, anesthesia alerted the surgical team to a change in the patient's vitals and coded.No device warnings or alarms were observed, and the duration of any pressure spike could not be determined, as the user was not immediately aware of an issue.The same insufflator was used to complete the procedure.The patient (female, 35 years old, bmi 37) was stable prior to the procedure and stable post procedure following resuscitation.No additional injuries, medical interventions, or prolonged hospitalization were reported".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The event description is very poor and general.Preventive maintenance of the device has been overdue for more than 2 years.At the time of the reporting decision the device was not returned for evaluation.Since there are many different reasons for cardiovascular problems/cardiac arrest during surgeries, including reasons that are independent of the device, and the information available to the manufacturer is insufficient for an assessment in this regard, the most probable root cause cannot be determined.The patient made it through the surgery, and no further complications were reported.Nevertheless, on a conservative approach, since we cannot completely exclude a malfunction of the device, this event is considered as reportable.If new information is received, or if the device is returned for evaluation, the reporting decision will be re-evaluated accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|