|
Investigation ¿ evaluation
it was reported the stent of the universa firm ureteral stent set broke during placement in the ureter.The break was detected when the user adjusted the stent¿s location and noticed breakage after pulling the stent out slightly.The procedure was completed using a new device.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, specifications, and instructions for use (ifu), as well as a visual inspection of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.One universa firm ureteral stent was returned to cook for evaluation.Upon visual inspection the stent was in two separate pieces and without a tether.Both coils were intact, so it appeared the tether was cut off.The break appeared to have happened at a sideport.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhrs for the reported complaint device lot and the related subassembly lots revealed no recorded discrepancies relevant to the failure mode.A review of complaint history records showed no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The product ifu, t_uss_rev5, ¿universa firm ureteral stents and stent sets¿ contains the following information related to the reported failure mode:
precautions
"do not force components during removal or replacement.¿
how supplied
"upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿
based on the information provided, product returned, and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded a potential root cause of the event could not be determined from the available information.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|