| Catalog Number |
72201491 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/11/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a meniscus repair, t2 of one fast fix fell off from the meniscus.The procedure was completed with a sn equivalent device.It is unknown if there was surgical delay.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known risks with the device itself or with its use that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H11 a1, a2, a3, a4 and b5: patient information and event description updated.H3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.An analysis of the customer provided image found the distal section of the insertion device being held.No anchor or suture can be seen.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.If any additional information related to this event is received in the future, this investigation will be reopened for assessment.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a meniscus repair, t2 of one fast fix fell off from the meniscus.T1 was removed with suction.The procedure was resumed, after a non significant delay, using an equivalent sn back-up.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation showed the device was returned in original packaging with the batch number of the complaint on the label.The t1, t2, and suture were not returned.The variable depth straw was not returned.Bio debris is present.A functional evaluation could not be performed because both implants have already been deployed.An analysis of the customer provided image found the distal section of the insertion device being held.No anchor or suture can be seen.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the investigation.Factors that can contribute to the reported event include failure to fully actuate the device behind the meniscus during implantation.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|