| Catalog Number |
400SWPC60 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/12/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the middle meningeal artery (mma) using swiftpac coils (swiftpac), a non-penumbra microcatheter, and a non-penumbra catheter.During the procedure, the physician placed embolization particles in the target vessel.The physician then advanced a swiftpac to the target location using the microcatheter and decided to reposition the swiftpac.It was reported that the physician experienced resistance advancing and retracting the swiftpac.While retracting, the embolization coil unintentionally detached within the microcatheter.The microcatheter containing the detached embolization coil was removed.While advancing the next swiftpac through the microcatheter, the swiftpac pusher assembly kinked.The swiftpac was removed.The procedure was completed at this point.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device has been returned, and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation of the first returned swiftpac coil (swiftpac) confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was intact, and the pull wire was in its initial position inside the distal detachment tip of the pusher assembly.If the swiftpac is retracted against resistance during use, the pusher assembly may elongate beyond the reach of the pull wire and result in the embolization coil detaching.It was reported that embolization particles had been placed in the target vessel.This may have contributed to the resistance during the procedure.Further evaluation revealed kinks on the pusher assembly and offset coil winds along the embolization coil.This damage is incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred due to advancement against resistance and during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Please note that the following section was inadvertently missed on the follow-up #01 mfr report and is being included on this follow-up #02: 1.Section h.Box 2.If follow-up, what type?.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|