| Model Number |
5822-5 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/11/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block h6: imdrf device code a0501 captures the reportable event of needle detachment of device or device component.Imdrf impact code f2301 captures the reportable event of additional device required to retrieve the detached fragment.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an expect pulmonary olympus 22ga was used in the lungs during an endobronchial ultrasound (ebus) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2025.During the procedure, a piece of the shaft of the needle broke and detached into the patient's airway.The device was removed, and the detached fragment was retrieved with a biopsy forceps.The procedure was completed with another same device.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an expect pulmonary olympus 22ga was used in the lungs during an endobronchial ultrasound (ebus) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2025.During the procedure, a piece of the shaft of the needle broke and detached into the patient's airway.The device was removed, and the detached fragment was retrieved with a biopsy forceps.The procedure was completed with another same device.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block h6: imdrf device code a0501 captures the reportable event of needle detachment of device or device component.Imdrf impact code f2301 captures the reportable event of additional device required to retrieve the detached fragment.Block h11: the returned expect pulmonary was analyzed, and product analysis found the working length and the needle was bent.Also, the scope attachment was observed damaged.During microscope inspection the needle was observed peeled off.The customer provided some pictures where it can observe the label information of the device and a sample of the piece that peeled off from the needle.Unable to confirm the reported code of "needle detachment of device or device component" with testing of the product returned.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of "needle detachment of device or device component" was defined in the risk documentation and is documented accordingly in the prr.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.It was confirmed this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.With all available information, boston scientific concludes that the reported event "needle detachment of device or device component" was not confirmed.The damages observed on the device were most likely related to procedural factors, such as device handling and the technique used by the physician (applied force), which could have caused the distal needle tip to peel off during the procedure.For these reasons, the events "needle damaged," "needle bent/kinked," "scope attachment damaged," and "working length bent/kinked" were classified as "adverse event related to procedure," as the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device did not contribute to the event.On the other hand, the reported event "additional device required" cannot be confirmed because it occurred during the procedure and there is no objective evidence or descriptive information available to verify the event.For this reason, this event will be classified as "cause not established." all compiled information from this investigation indicates that the most probable cause is "adverse event related to procedure.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|