|
Per rep - (b)(6)2025 - the catheter separated from the handle during the procedure.They were able to pull the full system out.Everything was intact.The procedure was successfully completed with another device of the same type.Details of access sheath used (name, fr size, length)? 7 fr, 90cm.What was the target location for the stent? brain.What disease pathology was being treated? stenosis in brain.Was the device used percutaneously? n/a, yes, no? yes.Was pre-dilation performed ahead of placement of the stent? n/a, yes, no? no.What was the access site chosen? right groin.Details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hydrophilic)? 018 boston scientific v18, not hydrophilic.Was a stent previously placed during previous procedures? no.Did the patient exhibit difficult anatomy (n/a, tortuous, altered, calcified, fibriotic)? (if altered please indicate the procedure type) moderately tortuous.Was the approach ipsilateral or contralateral? n/a, ispilateral, contralateral (if contralateral, was the bifurcation angle steep? n/a, yes, no) ipsilateral.What intervention (if any) was required? none.Was the secondary intervention performed during the same procedure as the device failure or was it scheduled for another day? n/a, same procedure, another day -n/a.Were any other defects (other than the complaint issue) observed on the delivery system prior to return (e.G., kink)? n/a, yes, no (if yes, please specify what additional defect(s) were observed and where on the device this was observed) no.What was the position of the elevator during deployment? -rep does not understand question.Was there resistance felt passing the delivery system through the stricture? yes, normal for brain.Was the stent being placed through the side wall of a previously placed stent? no.Did any part of the product snag/get caught on the stent when removing the delivery system? no.
|