|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX ULTRA PK 4.5MM W/2 UB -WHT &BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
72202595 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/16/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alter the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the twinfix ultra pk broke.The piece were removed from inside the patient using forceps.The procedure was resumed using an equivalent s+n backup inserted into the original bone hole, after a non-significant delay.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11 h3, h6 the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The insertion device was returned with the proximal end of the anchor in place.The distal 2/3 of the anchor is fractured away from the proximal end of the suture window and was returned off the device.The prongs at the distal end of the insertion shaft are deformed.There is biological debris on the returned items.A material assessment characteristic found that based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, it was determined that additional material testing is not required a review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the material specifications found that the storage conditions and material requirements are specified for the implant material.Each lot must be accompanied by a material certificate of analysis.A definitive root cause for the reported issue could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include procedural variance, or deviations from established protocols, increasing risks and leading to unintended consequences.Other factor lines include an application of improper/excessive force.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|