| Model Number |
1365.50.821 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
| Date of Event |
12/04/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Review of manufacturing and sterilization records did not identify any pre-existing anomaly or non-conformity that could have contributed to reported issue.The manufacturer will provide a final report as soon as the investigation is completed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2025 due to shoulder dislocation.Previous surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2025: smr reverse liner retentive +6mm dia40mm (part number 1365.50.821, lot 21at0fb, sterilization (b)(4) was implanted along with glenoid components (baseplate and glenosphere) from other manufacturer.Since patient dislocated, revision surgery was scheduled to add the smr extension for humeral reverse body (part number 1352.15.001) and replace the liner with a new one (part number 1365.50.821).Reduction was performed and stability was confirmed with this new assembly.Surgery has been completed as intended.Patient is a female, date of birth (b)(6) 1946.The event occurred in the united states.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2025 due to shoulder dislocation.Previous surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2025: smr reverse liner retentive +6mm dia40mm (part number 1365.50.821, lot 21at0fb, sterilization 2100270) was implanted along with glenoid components (baseplate and glenosphere) from other manufacturer.Since patient dislocated, revision surgery was scheduled to add the smr extension for humeral reverse body (part number 1352.15.001) and replace the liner with a new one (part number 1365.50.821).Reduction was performed and stability was confirmed with this new assembly.Surgery has been completed as intended.Patient is a female, date of birth (b)(6).The event occurred in the united states.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Review of manufacturing and sterilization records did not identify any pre-existing anomaly or non-conformity that could have contributed to reported issue.Despite requests, no further information has been provided.Review of complaint database revealed one other similar event for involved lot, which was definitively traced back to non-device related factors.Taking into account that issue was solved by increasing the thickness of the construct, it is reasonable to assume that cause of the dislocation was related to suboptimal choice of component during previous surgery 2 weeks before with possible contribution of soft tissue tensioning changes during healing, rather than a product problem.Based on the available pms data, the revision rate of smr reverse liners, belonging to the family product codes 1360.50.Xxx, 1361.50.Xxx and 1365.50.Xxx due to dislocation is around 0.1%.According to the investigation carried out, no corrective action is needed for this event.The manufacturer will continue monitoring the market in order to detect any similar event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|