• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MC3 INC. MC3; DUAL LUMEN ECMO CANNULA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MC3 INC. MC3; DUAL LUMEN ECMO CANNULA Back to Search Results
Model Number 70132
Medical Device Problem Codes Crack (1135); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/09/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a new insertion of the mc3 crescent jugular dual lumen catheter, blood was observed leaking from the drainage limb and a crack was identified at the connector on the venous side.The crack was difficult to visualize and was confirmed by flushing the device with water.The damage was not located at the sutures, and the hemostasis cap was used when the introducer was inserted into the cannula body connector.The device was replaced with another catheter, which functioned properly.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary: visual inspection shows evidence of white stress marks in the cannula connector.Pressure integrity testing was performed at, 0.5 l/pm with 15 psi, (776 mmhg) of backpressure for 10 min.During the pressure integrity test there were no leak observed from the cannula including the area of damage.Reason for the return was confirmed for damage.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info a2: patients age updated.Additional info a3(b): patients gender revealed.Additional info a4: patients weight information included.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Fdc code updated.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MC3
Common Device Name
DUAL LUMEN ECMO CANNULA
Manufacturer (Section D)
MC3 INC.
2555 bishop circle west
dexter MI 48130
Manufacturer (Section G)
MC3 INC.
2555 bishop circle west
dexter MI 48130
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key24034604
Report Number3011468686-2026-00001
Device Sequence Number13331338
Product Code PZS
UDI-Device Identifier10854916006826
UDI-Public(01)10854916006826(17)281031(10)2509566
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K180151
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/15/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number70132
Device Catalogue Number70132
Device Lot Number2509566
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/09/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/22/2026
02/16/2026
02/16/2026
04/10/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/12/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/16/2026
02/24/2026
02/24/2026
04/15/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexUnknown
Patient Weight92 KG
-
-