|
Product complaint#: (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.D4: full udi currently unavailable since the exact lot of the suspected device cannot be determined.Additional information: d4, h4: the actual device batch number associated with this event is not known.The following are the possible reported batch numbers: batch: 108l7p, mfg date: 05/24/2025, exp date: 04/30/2030.Batch: 108g5c, mfg date: unk, exp date: unk.In addition, a review of the manufacturing record evaluation for the possible batch number: 108l7p was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformance's were identified.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: patient needed to go back to the operating room, it is my understanding it was 24-48 hours post-op.Staff is uncertain which lot was used in the procedure so i included 7 each of remaining suture from lot#: 108l7p and 2 each of potential used suture lot#: 108g5c.Two lot numbers were reported: lot: 108l7p and lot: 108g5c.It was stated that ¿staff is uncertain which lot was used in the procedure.¿ or staff believe 108l7p was the lot used on both patient bring backs.However, once i got onsite, i saw 2 open boxes of 8706h and asked if there was a chance 108g5c could have been used.Staff was unsure if lot: 108g5c was used, based on limited information, i decided to ship back both lots just in case.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure date of index surgical procedure? the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? how was the suture tied (square knot or multiple knots one end)? did the wound dehis? if yes, what tissue dehisced? what symptoms did the patient experience following the index surgical procedure? onset date? please describe any medical/surgical intervention required for this suture event including dates and results.Please describe the appearance of the suture during the second procedure.Did the suture split longitudinally, or did it break in half? where on the suture was the post-op break noted? were there any precipitating patient stress factors for the suture breaking post-op? did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status?.
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a carotid endarectomy (rt) on an unknown date and suture was used for internal carotid artery closure.Post-op, 24-48 hours after the procedure, the patient needed to be brought back for a secondary procedure to repair the suture.The suture had split in half several days after the operation.Additional information was requested.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: h6 additional information: d4, h4 - the actual device batch number associated with this event is not known.The following are the possible reported batch numbers: batch 108l7p, mfg date: 05/24/2025, exp date: 04/30/2030 batch 108g5c, mfg date: 05/19/2025, exp date: 04/30/2030 in addition, a review of the manufacturing record evaluation for the possible batch numbers 108l7p and 108g5c were performed for the finished device lots, and no non-conformances were identified.
|