• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD, STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD, STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G15147
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/18/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported, the patient underwent an unspecified procedure in which a 'filiform double pigtail ureteral stent set' was implanted in the left ureter.During stent removal by the physician, it broke into three pieces.All pieces were subsequently removed using a reusable grasper.An unspecified manufacturer's cystoscope and stent retriever were used during removal.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
E3 - occupation: unknown; health professional: yes.G4 - pma/510(k) #: preamendment.H3 - device evaluation anticipated but not yet begun.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation as reported, the patient underwent an unspecified procedure in which a 'filiform double pigtail ureteral stent set' was implanted in the left ureter.During stent removal by the physician, it broke into three pieces.All pieces were subsequently removed using a reusable grasper.An unspecified manufacturer's cystoscope and stent retriever were used during removal.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, and instructions for use (ifu), as well as a visual inspection of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was returned to cook for evaluation.Upon visual inspection, the stent was returned with encrustation and in several pieces.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhrs for the reported complaint device lot and the related subassembly lots revealed no recorded discrepancies relevant to the failure mode.A review of complaint history records found no other related complaints associated with the failure mode for the complaint device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu packaged with the device contains the following in relation to the reported failure mode: ¿precautions.Do not force set components during placement, replacement, or removal.Carefully remove the set components if any resistance is encountered.¿ ¿how supplied upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the information provided, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation, a potential cause for this event could not be established.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET
Common Device Name
FAD, STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key24040511
Report Number1820334-2026-00031
Device Sequence Number10276833
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002151475
UDI-Public(01)00827002151475(17)270604(10)16088816
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/27/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG15147
Device Catalogue Number133628
Device Lot Number16088816
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/18/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/16/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/12/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/27/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/04/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-