| Model Number |
CNW0T5 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Discolored (1170)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/22/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A physician reported that during an intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, there was whiteish appearance on the lens.The surgery was completed on the same day.Additional information was received and stated, the finding of the iol was continuing even after the surgery.There was no impact on the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product was not returned for analysis; the lens remains implanted.Complaint history and product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Root cause has not been identified.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product was not returned for analysis.Only video was returned.The reported complaint was observed on the returned video.A product history record review and a non-conformance review of the reported lot number was conducted.No deviations were identified and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.A video was provided.The cataract removal was shown.This took 5:46 minutes.The lens and cartridge preparation were not shown.The lens loading and initial advancement were not shown.The cartridge tip came into view as it was inserted into the incision from the right side of the frame.Th yellow lens was visible just before the parting line.The leading haptic was tucked.The trailing haptic was misfolded looped and extended back on top of the plunger.The lens was rapidly advanced into the eye.Did not appear to be an company handpiece.The trailing haptic was pulled outside of the eye by the plunger.The lens was rotated with an instrument, which pulled the haptic back into the eye.The optic was cracked at the trailing haptic junction due to the misposition trailing haptic during delivery.The lens was left implanted.Upon further review of the video by the engineering representative it was determined that sheen can be observed on the lens.The root cause is deemed to be manufacturing related.Complaints have been received describing that lenses were reported by doctors for the presence of a polychromatic sheen visible.The cause of sheen or film like appearance is a result of a change in the positioning of the intraocular lens (iol) during the manufacturing process and is not associated with any foreign material or contamination.The observation has been reported clinically and confirmed in laboratory settings to disappear over time following implantation.The appearance is a result of a temporary change in the surface of the iol that occurs during the delivery process, which is only visible under certain orientations and illumination settings.This resolves once the iol is delivered and exposed to body temperature over time.There are no adverse impacts or lasting effects on the iol or the patient.Based on the results of the product investigation and testing, it was confirmed there are no adverse events or clinical impact on vision associated with this finding.With regard to the customer inquiry so are there really iols on the market that should be rejected during inspection, as stated above, there are no adverse impacts or lasting effects on the iol or the patient.Based on the results from the product history record, the products met release criteria.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|