• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVOLUTR-29-US
Medical Device Problem Codes Calcified (1077); Gradient Increase (1270); Malposition of Device (2616); Device Stenosis (4066)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Chest Pain (1776); Dyspnea (1816); Dizziness (2194)
Date of Event 11/16/2017
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that 8 years and 8 months following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, valve stenosis was identified.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information was received that the patient experienced shortness of breath as a result of the stenosis.Leaflet calcification was observed.It was reported that an intervention was required for the stenosis, and the patient was being evaluated for a valve-in-valve procedure.It was also noted that the valve was implanted deep at 10mm on the non-coronary cusp at the initial implant.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: a4.B1.B2.B5.H1.H6.Additional codes.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that 8 years and 8 months following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, valve stenosis was identified.Additional information was received that the patient experienced shortness of breath as a result of the stenosis.Leaflet calcification was observed.It was reported that an intervention was required for the stenosis, and the patient was being evaluated for a valve-in-valve procedure.It was also noted that the valve was implanted deep at 10mm on the non-coronary cusp at the initial implant.Additional information was received that after admission, an echocardiogram showed a mean gradient of 44 mmhg and peak gradient of 80 mmhg.The stenosis was noted to be severe and the patient experienced chest pain and dizziness.The patient was on plavix but the indication and start date were not known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated: b2, b3, b5, b6, b7, h6.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This is a system report.The section d.Information is for the primary device, which was in use with the following device(s) which cannot be excluded as potential contributing factors to the adverse event: brand name: enveor delivery catheter system (dcs); product id: enveor-us; lot: unknown; udi: unknown; manufactured date: unknown; use by date: unknown; implant date: n/a; fda site id: 9612164.Corrected: b3, b5, h6, h11.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that (b)(6) following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, valve stenosis was identified.Additional information was received that the patient experienced shortness of breath as a result of the stenosis.Leaflet calcification was observed.It was reported that an intervention was required for the stenosis, and the patient was being evaluated for a valve-in-valve procedure.It was also noted that the valve was implanted deep at 10mm on the non-coronary cusp at the initial implant.Additional information was received that after admission; an echocardiogram showed a mean gradient of 44 mmhg and peak gradient of 80 mmhg.The stenosis was noted to be severe and the patient experienced chest pain and dizziness.The patient was on plavix but the indication and start date were not known.The initial deep implant depth was not intended and was reported to be likely due to the delivery catheter system (dcs) technology at the time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key24054075
Report Number9617601-2026-00249
Device Sequence Number13188491
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00643169638006
UDI-Public(01)00643169638006(17)180112
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNV
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P130021
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/20/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/12/2018
Device Model NumberEVOLUTR-29-US
Device Catalogue NumberEVOLUTR-29-US
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/09/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/12/2026
01/23/2026
02/20/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/13/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/09/2026
02/20/2026
02/20/2026
Date Device Manufactured05/16/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight80 KG
-
-