|
As reported, physician and the technician were prepping a 6mm angioguard extra support device.When they attempted to bring the basket from the emboli capture into the deployment sheath, they had a tough time and struggled to get the basket into the deployment sheath.They were ultimately successful and successfully used and retrieved the device for the case.The product evaluation observed the filter basket and distal tip were separated.There was no reported injury to the patient.The device was prepped per the instructions for use (ifu).The device will be returned for evaluation.Additional information was requested; however, the information was not obtained after multiple attempts.Additional information related to the observed damages was requested, but not provided.
|
|
As reported, physician and the technician were prepping a 6mm angioguard extra support device.When they attempted to bring the basket from the emboli capture into the deployment sheath, they had a tough time and struggled to get the basket into the deployment sheath.They were ultimately successful and successfully used and retrieved the device for the case.The product evaluation observed the filter basket and distal tip were separated.There was no reported injury to the patient.The device was prepped per the instructions for use (ifu).The device will be returned for evaluation.Additional information was requested; however, the information was not obtained after multiple attempts.Additional information related to the observed damages was requested, but not provided.The 6mm basket, extra support, angioguard rx for us carotid was received inside a clear plastic bag and unpacked for visual evaluation; the returned components consisted of the capture sheath with the ecgw system inserted, and the distal tip including the filter was found to be separated from the ecgw system, with the separated piece not returned for analysis and no other components available for evaluation.Inspection of the separated area showed surface characteristics consistent with tool marks, which are commonly associated with separations caused by mechanical cutting or force applied by an unknown tool that exceeded the material hardness prior to separation.Functional analysis related to delivery system loading or docking difficulty through the introducer could not be performed because the device was returned in a condition that did not allow functional testing and the key components required to dock the filter basket into the delivery sheath were not returned.The malfunctions ¿distal tip (ecgw) ¿ separated¿ and ¿filter basket ¿ separated¿ were observed during the product evaluation.The exact cause of these events cannot be determined.The device was successfully used and retrieved the device for the case.Additionally, inspection of the separated area showed surface characteristics consistent with tool marks, which are commonly associated with separations caused by mechanical cutting or force applied by an unknown tool that exceeded the material hardness prior to separation.Therefore, intentional cutting of the device after removing it from the patient cannot be excluded.The reported ¿delivery system ¿ loading (docking) difficulty ¿ through introducer¿ could not be substantiated because due to the condition in which the device was returned and the inability to perform functional evaluation.The exact cause of the loading difficulty cannot be determined.Users are trained to inspect for signs of damage prior to and during use, and any product with damage is not to be used.Information for safety is provided in the product labeling with the intent of making the user aware of potential risks.According to the instructions for use (ifu), ¿caution: guidewires are delicate instruments and should be handled carefully.Prior to use, and when possible during the procedure, inspect the guidewire carefully for coil separation, bends, kinks, or damage of the filter basket assembly.Do not use defective equipment.¿ investigations are underway to further evaluate and address findings related to loading difficulty that may be potentially manufacturing related; however, the affected components associated with this specific event were not returned for analysis, which prevented confirmatory evaluation.Although the information provided by the customer suggests a potential association, manufacturing causation for this event could not be confirmed based on the information reviewed.Therefore, this event will continue to be monitored through routine complaint trending and post-market surveillance activities.At this time, there is no evidence to support a confirmed relationship between this event and the device design or manufacturing process.
|
|
As reported, physician and the technician were prepping a 6mm angioguard extra support device.When they attempted to bring the basket from the emboli capture into the deployment sheath, they had a tough time and struggled to get the basket into the deployment sheath.They were ultimately successful and successfully used and retrieved the device for the case.The product evaluation observed the filter basket and distal tip were separated.There was no reported injury to the patient.The device was prepped per the instructions for use (ifu).The device will be returned for evaluation.Additional information was requested; however, the information was not obtained after multiple attempts.Additional information related to the observed damages was requested, but not provided.
|