|
A remstar plus device was returned to a third-party service center as part of the uno recall process with no initial alleged complaint.During the evaluation of the device, the service technician observed visible foam particles inside the blower kit.Additionally, the service technician noted dust fail contamination.The device was scrapped by the service center after the evaluation was completed.
|
|
In the previously submitted report, a remstar plus device was returned to a third-party service center as part of the uno recall process with no initial alleged complaint.During the evaluation of the device, the service technician observed visible foam particles inside the blower kit.Additionally, the service technician noted dust fail contamination.The device was scrapped by the service center after the evaluation was completed.In this report, updated event or problem description will be- the manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice / recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.A remstar plus device was returned to a third-party service center with no initial alleged complaint.During the evaluation of the device at the third-party service center, the device was visually inspected, and evidence of foam particles was found inside the blower kit.Additionally, the service technician also noted dust fail contamination.The device was scrapped by the service center after the evaluation was completed.Box g 510k number has been updated or corrected in this report.
|