|
Section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5, a6, patient information: unknown/not provided.Section d6a, if implanted, give date: not applicable as it is unknown if the iol was implanted.Section d6b, if explanted, give date: not applicable as it is unknown if the iol was implanted and there is no indication the iol was explanted.Section h3, device evaluated by manufacturer: the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain the missing information.However, to date, it has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Additional information.Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: jan 15, 2026.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the handpiece was received with the plunger rod partially advanced.Viscoelastic residue was observed throughout the cartridge.The cartridge tip was bent and cracked; the cartridge was also cracked.No issues were identified with the lens module, device assembly, and plunger rod advancement.The plunger rod tip was slightly bent.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|