|
Product complaint # (b)(4) this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts are being made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 2/17/2026.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.H3 investigational summary: the product was returned to eth for evaluation.Visual analysis revealed that one labeled winding former with one detached needle and one suture piece were received for analysis.Product code sxpp1a432.During visual inspection of the suture, the fixation tab was intact.The opposite end of the suture was noted to be cut probably caused by a surgical instrument.In addition, damage and missing barbs were observed during the evaluation.Upon inspection of the needle the swage area was noted to be as expected.The barrel hole was examined and no suture remnat could be observed.In addition, the remaining section of the suture was not returned for evaluation.As the suture is absorbable and the duration of exposure of the suture in the environment could not be determined, the functional test could not be performed.As part of the quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|