|
Additional information was provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.11.The device with the lens was returned in the blister tray.The plunger lock and lens stop have been removed.The plunger was oriented incorrectly upon return.Inadequate viscoelastic was observed in the device.The plunger and lens were advanced to mid-nozzle.The plunger was advanced over the lens to the fill line of the device.The nozzle was removed and cleaned for further evaluation.The lens was removed during cleaning.Topcoat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.A device history record review and a non-conformance review of the reported lot number was conducted.The deviation review did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.A non-qualified viscoelastic was indicated.The root cause may be related to a failure to follow the instructions for use (ifu).An inadequate amount of viscoelastic was observed in the device.The ifu instructs: fill the device until viscoelastic can be observed flowing to the line on the nozzle tip.This will require approximately 0.2 ml of viscoelastic.If inadequate viscoelastic is placed in the device this will cause inadequate coverage of the lens fold path which may cause the lens to advance incorrectly or become ¿stuck¿ in the device allowing the plunger to override the lens.A non-qualified viscoelastic was used in the device.The ifu instructs: during device preparation and implantation of the company iol with the company preloaded delivery system, a company qualified ophthalmic viscoelastic device (ovd) should be used.The use of an unqualified ovd may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the device preparation and implantation steps.Upon return, the plunger was observed to be oriented incorrectly in the device.It cannot be determined if the plunger may have been inadvertently retracted outside of the device and reinserted incorrectly by the customer.Although the plunger orientation cannot be ruled out as a potential cause, it is unlikely that the device was manufactured incorrectly.Plunger placement is conducted with a plunger/main body assembly fixture.The fixture by design ensures the proper orientation and placement of the plunger in the device.Plunger override may occur: ¿ due to rapid advancement faster than the ifu recommend rate.¿ due to the use of a non-qualified viscoelastic.Material properties of non-qualified ovds may contribute to underfill, overfill, misfolding of the haptics, or other inconsistent folding outcomes.¿ if inadequate viscoelastic is placed in the device this will cause inadequate coverage of the lens fold path which may cause the lens to advance incorrectly or become ¿stuck¿ in the device allowing the plunger to override the lens.¿ if the operating room temperature is too high (> 23°c / 73° f) lens folding consistency is negatively affected, the lens is more adherent, and this may inhibit lens advancement.Any of the above listed causes alone, or in combination, may create the reported event.Topcoat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|